• Contact Support

  • Login

  • Back to Insights

    CRE debt markets entered a state of transition in Q1 2026

    Floating-rate borrowers captured the biggest gains as SOFR dropped another 34 bps, but rising Treasury yields created a split narrative across the capital stack.

    GettyImages

    May 26, 2026

    9 min read

    Share
    Share this on
    Send this by

    Key takeaways

    • SOFR plunged 67 bps year-over-year and 34 bps quarter-over-quarter to 366 bps, with floating-rate borrowers benefiting from falling all-in costs across nearly every property type

    • The 5-Year UST and 10-Year UST each rose 10 bps quarter-over-quarter to 377 bps and 420 bps, respectively, reversing several quarters of declines and partially offsetting spread compression for fixed-rate borrowers

    • Total quotes rose 24% quarter-over-quarter to 1,866, with quotes per participant jumping to a high of 17.0 and borrowers continuing to receive roughly 5.1 competitive quotes for new financing


    The first quarter of 2026 delivered a more nuanced picture of the CRE debt markets than the broad-based improvement that defined 2025. SOFR continued its descent, falling to a quarterly average of 366 bps and bringing floating-rate all-in costs meaningfully lower. But Treasury yields moved the other direction. The 5-Year and 10-Year both rose roughly 10 bps quarter-over-quarter, pushing fixed-rate benchmarks higher for the first time in several quarters. The result was a market where the direction of your rate depends on the structure of your loan. Quote volume rebounded 24% from 4Q 2025's holiday-depressed levels, and engaged participants reported nearly 17 quotes each. The survey captured 1,866 quotes from 110 industry professionals, providing a detailed look at where the market stands as 2026 takes shape.

    Quote activity and market composition


    The 1,866 total quotes reported in 1Q 2026 represent a healthy rebound from 4Q 2025's 1,511. The quarterly increase of 24% largely reflects the absence of holiday-related slowdowns that depressed 4Q activity. Year-over-year, volume is still down 18% from 1Q 2025's 2,289 quotes, but the per-participant engagement tells a more optimistic story. Each survey participant reported an average of 17.0 quotes, up sharply from 13.3 in 4Q 2025 and higher than any quarter since 2Q 2025. That suggests the active participants in this market are very active.

    On the competitive landscape, borrowers seeking new financing received approximately 5.1 competitive quotes on average, essentially flat with 4Q 2025's 5.2 and in line with the 5.1 seen a year ago in 1Q 2025. Lender competition remains stable. Borrowers with quality assets in favored sectors continue to attract multiple bids, though we haven't seen the kind of acceleration in competition that might signal overheating.


    Surveyed quotes: Count of quotes received by product type

    Rate type

    Product

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ %Δ

    Q1 2025

    YoY %Δ

    Fixed

    Senior Short (1)

    388

    394

    -2%

    568

    -32%

    Fixed

    Senior Long (2)

    358

    210

    70%

    310

    15%

    Fixed

    Mezzanine (2)

    73

    78

    -6%

    117

    -38%

    Fixed

    Pref. Eq. (3)

    44

    52

    -15%

    77

    -43%

    Floating

    Senior Short (4)

    720

    573

    26%

    930

    -23%

    Floating

    Mezzanine (4)

    159

    117

    36%

    143

    11%

    Floating

    Repo/Facility (4)

    124

    87

    43%

    144

    -14%


     Total (All products)

    1,866

    1,511

    23%

    2,289

    -18%

    Benchmarks: 1) 5-Year US Treasury yield; 2) 10-Year US Treasury yield; 3) All-in Coupon Rate %; 4) Term SOFR




    Product mix: As percentage of total quotes received

    Rate type

    Product

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ %Δ

    Q1 2025

    YoY %Δ

    Fixed

    Senior Short (1)

    21%

    26%

    -5%

    25%

    -4%

    Fixed

    Senior Long (2)

    19%

    14%

    5%

    14%

    6%

    Fixed

    Mezzanine (2)

    4%

    5%

    -1%

    5%

    -1%

    Fixed

    Pref. Eq. (3)

    2%

    3%

    -1%

    3%

    -1%

    Floating

    Senior Short (4)

    39%

    38%

    1%

    41%

    -2%

    Floating

    Mezzanine (4)

    9%

    8%

    1%

    6%

    2%

    Floating

    Repo/Facility (4)

    7%

    6%

    1%

    6%

    0%


     Total (All products)

    100%

    100%


    100%


    Benchmarks: 1) 5-Year US Treasury yield; 2) 10-Year US Treasury yield; 3) All-in Coupon Rate %; 4) Term SOFR


    The product mix showed floating-rate senior short leading the way at 39% of total quotes (720 quotes), followed by fixed-rate senior short at 21% (388 quotes) and fixed-rate senior long at 19% (358 quotes). Floating-rate mezzanine accounted for 9% (159 quotes), while repo/warehouse facilities made up 7% (124 quotes). The floating-rate dominance makes sense given where SOFR is heading. Borrowers who expect continued Fed easing have reason to stay floating rather than lock in.


    Collateral sector mix: As percentage of total quotes received

    Property type

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ %Δ

    Q1 2025

    YoY %Δ

    Residential

    23%

    25%

    -2%

    26%

    -3%

    Industrial

    18%

    20%

    -2%

    18%

    0%

    Office

    17%

    17%

    0%

    16%

    1%

    Retail

    17%

    15%

    2%

    17%

    -1%

    Hotel

    8%

    7%

    0%

    6%

    2%

    Specialty

    8%

    6%

    2%

    6%

    2%

    Construction

    10%

    9%

    0%

    10%

    0%

    All Collateral

    100%

    100%


    100%



    On the collateral side, residential retained its top position at 23% of total quotes, followed by industrial at 18%. Office and retail tied at 17% each. Construction came in at 10%, with hotel and specialty each at 8%. Office maintaining its share near the levels seen in 4Q 2025 (when it jumped to 17%) suggests the re-engagement with that sector wasn't a one-quarter anomaly. Lenders continue to differentiate within office, favoring trophy and well-leased properties.


    Benchmark rates: The yield curve normalizes


    This quarter's benchmark story is a tale of two markets. SOFR continued its steady decline, averaging 366 bps for the quarter, down 34 bps from 4Q 2025's 399 bps and down 67 bps year-over-year. The Fed's rate-cutting cycle remains the dominant force for floating-rate pricing.


    Figure 1: Benchmark yields (Quarterly average, bps)

    Insight Benchmark Yields

    Source: US Treasury


    Treasury yields, however, reversed course. The 5-Year UST averaged 377 bps, up 10 bps from 367 bps in 4Q 2025 but still down 48 bps year-over-year. The 10-Year UST averaged 420 bps, also up 10 bps quarter-over-quarter and down 26 bps from a year ago. After several quarters of declining Treasury yields, this uptick introduces a wrinkle for fixed-rate borrowers. The year-over-year trajectory is still favorable, but the quarter-over-quarter trend is not.


    Benchmark

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ Δ (bps)

    Q1 2025 (%)

    YoY Δ (bps)

    5-Year UST

    3.77

    3.67

    +10

    4.25

    -48

    10-Year UST

    4.20

    4.10

    +10

    4.45

    -26

    Term SOFR

    3.66

    3.99

    -33

    4.33

    -67


    This divergence matters. Floating-rate borrowers saw their benchmark costs drop meaningfully, while fixed-rate borrowers absorbed a modest increase. The spread compression happening in the market helped offset some of the Treasury backup, but not all of it.


    Spreads: Compression across the board


    Spreads continued their tightening trend in Q1 2026. The weighted average spread on lower-leverage floating-rate senior short financing came in at 267 bps over SOFR, while higher-leverage floating-rate senior short averaged 348 bps. On the fixed side, lower-leverage senior short averaged 218 bps over the 5-Year Treasury and higher-leverage averaged 303 bps.


    Spreads: Average spread by product type

    Rate type

    Product

    Leverage (LTV)

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ %Δ

    Q1 2025

    YoY %Δ

    Fixed

    Senior Short (1)

    Lower (≤65%)

    218

    225

    -3%

    255

    -15%

    Fixed

    Senior Short (1)

    Higher (>65%)

    303

    312

    -3%

    330

    -8%

    Fixed

    Senior Long (2)

    Lower (≤65%)

    203

    201

    1%

    218

    -7%

    Fixed

    Senior Long (2)

    Higher (>65%)

    273

    256

    7%

    300

    -9%

    Fixed

    Mezzanine (2)

    70-90%

    774

    814

    -5%

    887

    -13%

    Fixed

    Pref. Eq. (3)

    ≥70%

    12.37

    12.68

    -2%

    13.51

    -8%

    Floating

    Senior Short (4)

    Lower (≤65%)

    267

    253

    5%

    275

    -3%

    Floating

    Senior Short (4)

    Higher (>65%)

    348

    361

    -4%

    388

    -10%

    Floating

    Mezzanine (4)

    70-90%

    752

    780

    -4%

    840

    -10%

    Floating

    Repo/Facility (4)

    Adv Rate (50-80%)

    206

    171

    20%

    205

    0%

    Benchmarks: 1) 5-Year US Treasury yield; 2) 10-Year US Treasury yield; 3) All-in Coupon Rate %; 4) Term SOFR


    Fixed-rate mezzanine spreads averaged 774 bps over the 10-Year, while floating-rate mezzanine came in at 752 bps over SOFR. Preferred equity coupons averaged 12.4%.


    Senior-short spreads: Average spreads by select collateral type*

    Property type

    Q1 2026

    Q4 2025

    QoQ %Δ

    Q1 2025

    YoY %Δ

    Residential

    240

    243

    -1%

    249

    -4%

    Industrial

    247

    242

    2%

    257

    -4%

    Office

    330

    357

    -8%

    348

    -5%

    Retail

    296

    255

    16%

    324

    -9%

    Hotel

    324

    379

    -14%

    400

    -19%

    Specialty

    302

    308

    -2%

    405

    -26%

    Construction

    344

    357

    -4%

    396

    -13%

    Note: Average spreads for senior, short-term fixed and floating rate debt; not all property types shown

    All-in rates: Meaningful relief for borrowers


    When you combine benchmark moves with spread compression, the all-in rate picture becomes the most telling indicator of where borrowing costs actually land. Across all property types and subtypes, the average quarter-over-quarter change in all-in rates was -10 bps, with the average year-over-year change at -68 bps. The year-over-year relief continues to be substantial, even as the pace of quarter-over-quarter improvement has slowed from Q4 2025's -45 bps average.

    At the property type level, hotels were the runaway story. Hotel all-in rates fell 59 bps quarter-over-quarter to 582 bps, the largest move of any sector by a wide margin. Within the sector, Limited Service dropped 68 bps to 574 bps (down 150 bps year-over-year, or 21%), while Full Service fell 51 bps to 591 bps (down 112 bps YoY, or 16%). This kind of repricing signals that lenders have grown meaningfully more comfortable with hospitality risk after years of post-pandemic caution.


    Figure 2: All-in rates (Assume 65% senior, 15% mezzanine; bps)

    Insight All in rates

    Source: Altus Group US Debt Capital Markets Survey (Q2 2024 - Q1 2026)


    Office all-in rates continued their descent, falling 22 bps quarter-over-quarter to 587 bps and 79 bps year-over-year. Trophy office saw the steepest YoY decline, down 100 bps to 566 bps, while Commodity Suburban fell 91 bps YoY to 607 bps and Commodity Urban dropped 95 bps to 603 bps. The spread between Trophy and Commodity product has narrowed, suggesting capital is flowing more broadly into the sector rather than concentrating only at the top.

    Residential and industrial both declined about 11 bps quarter-over-quarter to 525 and 532 bps respectively, with year-over-year drops of 65 and 68 bps. These two sectors remain the lowest-cost conventional asset classes and continue their steady march lower.

    On the other end, a few sectors saw modest increases. Retail all-in rates ticked up 6 bps quarter-over-quarter to 563 bps (though still down 58 bps YoY), and construction edged up 4 bps to 634 bps. The construction story has a notable outlier in Construction Office, which jumped 133 bps quarter-over-quarter to 797 bps, a reflection of the still-challenging risk profile for new office development. Specialty was essentially flat at 571 bps.


    Looking ahead


    The Q1 2026 data paints a market in transition. The floating-rate side of the capital stack continues to benefit from SOFR's decline, and sectors like hotel are seeing aggressive repricing that would have been hard to imagine a year ago. But the uptick in Treasury yields is a reminder that the path lower isn't guaranteed for fixed-rate borrowers. If long rates continue to climb while SOFR falls, borrowers will face an increasingly important decision about rate structure. Transaction volumes, lender competition, and the pace of the Fed's remaining cuts will determine whether the current momentum carries through the rest of the year. For now, the market remains borrower-friendly, but the easy gains may be behind us.


    AGL - US CRE Investment Report Background

    Boost investor confidence with independently managed valuations

    Independent appraisals trusted by funds, investors, lenders, and public entities around the world.


    Explore our services


    Want to be notified of our new and relevant CRE content, articles and events?




    Disclaimer


    This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only and does not constitute professional advice or services of Altus Group, its affiliates and its related entities (collectively “Altus Group”). You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice.

    A number of factors may influence the performance of the commercial real estate market, including regulatory conditions and economic factors such as interest rate fluctuations, inflation, changing investor sentiment, and shifts in tenant demand or occupancy trends. We strongly recommend that you consult with a qualified professional to assess how these and other market dynamics may impact your investment strategy, underwriting assumptions, asset valuations, and overall portfolio performance.

    No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this publication, or the suitability of the information for a particular purpose. To the extent permitted by law, Altus Group does not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. The distribution of this publication to you does not create, extend or revive a client relationship between Altus Group and you or any other person or entity. This publication, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced or distributed in any form for any purpose without the express written consent of Altus Group.

    Authors
    People - Omar Eltorai's Profile
    Omar Eltorai

    Senior Director of Research, Altus Group

    Andrew Pabon's Profile
    Andrew Pabon

    Director Global Advisory

    Authors
    People - Omar Eltorai's Profile
    Omar Eltorai

    Senior Director of Research, Altus Group

    Andrew Pabon's Profile
    Andrew Pabon

    Director Global Advisory

    Resources

    Latest insights

    GettyImages x

    May 26, 2026

    CRE debt markets entered a state of transiction in Q1 2026

    Read more
    HEro

    May 22, 2026

    Are uncontrolled spreadsheets damaging CRE portfolio performance

    Read more
    GettyImages x

    May 19, 2026

    Solving operational challenges and accelerating insights through data integration

    Read more
    CRE Exchange Card Banner rebrand

    May 14, 2026

    A split market: Commercial real estate lending trends from Q1 2026

    Read more
    GettyImages x

    May 5, 2026

    Under the hood of niche valuations: The income side of the story

    Read more
    GettyImages x

    Apr 30, 2026

    The evolution of ARGUS: From valuation to full-lifecycle investment platform

    Read more