Economic and market issues frequently are important factors in land
use disputes and in litigation involving real estate and the construction
industry. Clayton Research has considerable experience giving expert
witness testimony in these cases. The firm is well known for its
sound economic and market perspective, with a solid understanding
of demographics, economics, real estate markets and participants,
land development and construction processes, planning and related
policies, and financial markets. Typical subjects for testimony
include:
Demographics and Local Economy
Determining future population growth and its composition, household
growth and its composition, and employment growth by type. (These
assignments can be self-standing or part of a broader assignment
looking at such matters as retail sales potential, housing and employment
space and lands demands, and economic and community impact.)
Real Estate Demand/Highest and Best Use
Evaluating the nature of demand for particular use(s), either on
specific sites or in wider planning areas.
Land Needs
Assessing the need for and implications of proposals for greenfield
and brownfield sites, through a land demand or requirements
analysis based on demographic and local economy information, and
a land supply assessment.
Infill and Intensification
Bringing credible, research-based information to the discussion
of proposals that sometimes attract considerable neighbourhood and
municipal opposition.
Municipal Finance/Development Charges
Providing evidence on the municipal finance impacts of development
proposals ranging from infill projects to new communities and for
development charge issues before the Ontario Municipal Board.
Injurious Infection
Valuing the impacts of events, from expropriation of highway lands,
to contamination of cement, and break up of business relationships.
Experience
Clayton Research has prepared and given expert witness testimony
in a wide variety of cases before courts and quasi-judicial bodies.
The firm has gained an enviable reputation for thoughtful, research-based
evidence in disputes such as the following:
"Highest and Best" Residential Use
As part of an arbitration hearing dealing with a land lease rent
review for a high-rise rental apartment building constructed in
the 1960s in Mississauga, Clayton Research undertook an analysis
of the market support for alternative residential uses (condominium
apartment, stacked townhouses and townhouses) for the site.
Implications of Reduction in Shelter Allowances
As part of a Divisional Court hearing into a constitutional challenge
of Ontarios social assistance policies, Clayton Research examined
the implications of a reduction in shelter allowances. The housing
situations of recipients before and after the reductions were compared
to that of other low income households in Ontario and in other provinces.
Impact of Vaughan Interchange on Value and Highest and Best Use of Land
An expropriated landowner claimed that the construction of an interchange
injuriously affected the value and use of the remaining lands for
retail purposes because of reduced visibility from Highway 400.
Clayton Research demonstrated that the increased traffic flows would
more than compensate for the reduced visibility for retail potential.
Credits for Lot Levy Payments
Clayton Research provided analysis of development charge credits
for lot levy payments made by developers in Mississauga, Burlington
and Toronto before the adoption of Ontario's first Development Charge
Act in 1989. This analysis helped provide the "factual matrix"
the Ontario Municipal Board used in interpreting the terms of various
lot levy agreements.
City of London Official Plan
Clayton Research critically reviewed the residential land needs
analysis prepared by the City of London in support of its Official
Plan, and found that an error had been made in converting net land
requirements to gross land requirements. At the Ontario Municipal
Board hearing for the Official Plan, Clayton Research explained
why the City's long-term population and housing projections should
not be changed to reflect short-term economic fluctuations and why
the urban boundary had to be expanded to accommodate projected demand.
Illustrative Case Profiles
Cachet Woods Ratepayers Association Inc. appeal of Town of Markham official plan amendment No.43
F & F Realty Holdings Inc. vs. Ontario Ministry of Transportation
Gateshead Enterprises Limited: Proposal to develop a neighbourhood shopping centre, City of Mississauga
Goldlist Properties Inc. appeal of City of Toronto's refusal to permit replacing existing rental apartments with new condominium apartments and townhouses
Mori Nurseries Ltd.: Town of Pelham urban area boundary expansion
Expertise
Clayton Research staff brings a variety of backgrounds and specialized
economic and market expertise to expert witness testimony. Read
more about Frank Clayton, President,
Jeannette Gillezeau, Vice
President, Robert Feldgaier,
Vice President, Residential Services, Peter
Norman, Vice President and other senior
staff members.
|